Samedi 2 août 2025
趕時間的時候,選擇住家對面的路易莎
純素過午不食最佳選擇(scream)
Even miles from the front line, anything
that moves is a target.
That’s because as Russia’s summer offensive
gains momentum, it is increasingly relying on drones of all kinds to gain
control over Ukraine’s territory.
Under attack by drones, Ukrainian soldiers
are struggling to maintain supply lines around the towns of Kostiantynivka,
Pokrovsk and Kupiansk. There is greater peril for civilians remaining in their
homes, and for the humanitarian groups trying to evacuate them. Some Russian
drones strike at ranges up to 24 miles.
Senior Lt. Yevhen Alkhimov, a spokesperson
for the 28th Separate Mechanized Brigade, said movement to and from
positions now posed the greatest risk for his soldiers. Nightfall brought no
safety because more Russian drones had thermal imaging cameras. Once at the actual
bunkers and trenches on the front, “it is usually possible to work,” he said.
The combination of drone strikes with
aerial bombardments is devastating, soldiers say.
When the drones arrive, if there is
greenery, it is easier for the troops to hide and then reach their positions,
they say. If there is nowhere to hide, it’s very hard to move.
Many elderly and disabled civilians still
live in these areas. Until they lose access to food and water, it is hard to persuade
them to leave their homes, humanitarian workers say.
In Kupiansk, around 1,000 residents remain,
according to government figures. Their homes are at constant risk from artillery,
aerial bombs and drones, said Liana Shcherbyna, head of the Proliska
Humanitarian Center in the Kharkiv region, which helps evacuate civilians.
“Almost every day, there are civilian
casualties,” she said.
In May, during one evacuation mission in
Kupiansk, her team had to order people to lie down as drones were heard flying
overhead.
Despite repeated attacks near her home in
Kupiansk, Vira Shapka, 86, a composer and member of the National Union of
Artists of Ukraine, refused to depart when rescue teams returned in May.
Although a large part of the population has
been evacuated from areas close to the fighting. “a certain number of people still
remain due to various circumstances, from reluctance to leave their homes to physical
or psychological reasons,” Shcherbyna said.
On the roads, evacuation teams report
increased danger for their vehicles because for reconnaissance and exploding
first-person-view drones. Ukraine lacks sufficient countermeasures. (Maria
Varenikova)
由於自身遭遇的情境,近日意識潛意識均出現大量訊息下載現象,包括Stanford Prison Experiment ~~路西法效應~~,網路上蒐集到的資訊如下(這句詞之前的關鍵字是黑人女性拒絕給白人讓座遭逮捕,而這關鍵句子之前的前因是業務會議開會不讓進場是否構成職場霸凌?)
我發現很多我們視為理所當然沒有意識察覺的事情背後其實可能隱藏著許多大量的並不為人所知不是我們想像的這麼簡單單純的事情,我們把很多事情想得太過於簡單單純了,背後蘊含含藏的很可能是大量的運作,需要深入探討或許才能讀懂的真相。
114.8.1(五)AI 摘要
+3
「路西法效應」指的是在特定情境下,原本看似平凡的人或團體,會因為環境或情況的影響,而展現出人性中邪惡的一面,做出違背道德甚至反人類的行為,就像《路西法效應:好人是如何變成惡魔的》這本書所探討的,好人也可能在特定條件下變成惡魔。
路西法效應的成因
盲目服從權威:
人們容易在有權威的人或團體面前,失去獨立思考能力,進而盲目服從命令,即使這些命令是錯誤的或不道德的。
去個人化和去人性化:
當個人或團體被視為「非我族類」或「非人」時,就容易對其進行歧視、迫害,甚至施加暴力,因為少了同理心和道德約束。
匿名性和群體效應:
在匿名或群體環境中,個人更容易失去責任感,做出平時不敢做的行為,因為認為自己不用為此承擔責任,或是受到群體氛圍的影響。
路西法效應的例子
斯坦福監獄實驗:
美國心理學家菲利普·津巴多於1971年進行的斯坦福監獄實驗,就生動地展示了路西法效應。
在實驗中,被隨機分配為獄警的學生,在短短幾天內,就對被分配為囚犯的學生施加了嚴重的心理和肢體虐待,顯示了情境和角色扮演的力量。
阿布格萊布監獄虐囚案:
美國軍人在伊拉克阿布格萊布監獄虐待囚犯的事件,也反映了路西法效應,顯示了在戰爭和特殊環境下,士兵也可能做出泯滅人性的行為。
總結
路西法效應提醒我們,人性是複雜的,好人和壞人之間並沒有絕對的界線。 在特定的情境下,任何人都可能受到影響,做出超出自己想像的事情。 因此,我們需要保持警惕,警惕情境的影響,並努力維護道德底線,避免陷入集體迷思和盲目服從。